Sea buckthorn fly, manifestations of its turn and control in agrocenoses of buckthorn

  • T. Moskalets Institute of Horticulture, NAAS, 23, Sadova, str., Novosilky, Kyiv-27, 03027, Ukraine
  • V. Moskalets Institute of Horticulture, NAAS, 23, Sadova, str., Novosilky, Kyiv-27, 03027, Ukraine
  • I. Grynyk Institute of Horticulture, NAAS, 23, Sadova, str., Novosilky, Kyiv-27, 03027, Ukraine
  • I.V. Shevchuk Institute of Horticulture, NAAS, 23, Sadova, str., Novosilky, Kyiv-27, 03027, Ukraine
Keywords: sea buckthornfly (Rhagoletis batava Hering); bioecological properties; morphological signs; assessment of the manifestation of harmfulness; control measures; agrocenosis of sea buckthorn

Abstract

Goal. To investigate the bioecological and morphological features of the sea buckthorn fly, to evaluate the manifestations of parasitism and methods of phytophage control in agrocenoses of the sea buckthorn.

Methods. Census of sea buckthorn flies was carried out in agrocenoses of sea buckthorn of the The Institute of Horticulture of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, its research network. The studies used sea buckthorn varieties of domestic and foreign selection, which differ in ripeness groups: mid-early, mid-ripening, late-ripening.

Results. In the conditions of the Polesia-Forest-Steppe and Forest-Steppe ecotopes, a pest of agrocenoses of the sea buckthorn buckthorn fly was revealed. Bioecological features and morphological characteristics of this pest have been investigated. It has been established that in the conditions of the Western and Northern Forest-steppe of Ukraine, mid-early and mid-season varieties of sea buckthorn suffer from the sea buckthorn fly. A set of measures has been developed for the use of elements of agricultural technology, biological and chemical preparations for the control of sea buckthorn flies in sea buckthorn agrocenoses.

Conclusions. It has been shown that the populations of the sea buckthorn fly are numerous on plants of early and mid-season varieties of sea buckthorn, in particular, on such as: Chuiskaya, Pagorbova, Morkvyana, Pavilionna. It was found that the larvae of flies penetrate the fruits, where they feed on the pulp, after which the sea buckthorn fruits become completely unsuitable for fresh consumption and for processing. Research carried out during 2017—2020 in the conditions of the Polesia-Forest-Steppe and Forest-Steppe ecotopes, it was possible to identify varieties of sea buckthorn (Orangevya, Adaptyvna), which are relatively resistant to sea buckthorn fly. It has been established that carrying out agrotechnical measures for loosening the soil in the near-stem part of plants and aisles, sowing perennial herbaceous vegetation in the aisles against the background of changing weather conditions significantly inhibits the development of the sea buckthorn fly and reduces damage to sea buckthorn fruits.

References

Moskalets T.Z., Frantsishko V.S., Knyazyuk O.V. et al. (2019). Hippophae rhamnoides L. berries and implications for their targeted use in the food-processing industry. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9(4), 749-764. http://dx.doi:10.15421/2019-822

Plate J.-K., Holz U., Riede M., Neuenfeldt N. (2014). Erstauftreten der Sanddornfruchtfliege (Rhagoletis batava Her.) im Bundesland Brandenburg (Nord-Ostdeutschland). 59. Deutsche Pflanzenschutztagung «Forschen – Wissen – Pflanzen schützen: Ernährung sichern!» 23. bis 26. September 2014, Freiburg. Poster Tierische Schaderreger.

Höhne Fr. (2015). Die Sanddornfruchtfliege – Untersuchungen zur Biologie und zum Auftreten 2014 in Gülzow. Info-Blatt für den Gartenbau in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. N. 1. S. 52-64 [Deutsche]..

Moskalets V.V., Hrynyk I.V., Moskalets T.Z. et al. (2021). Bioekolohichni osoblyvosti shkidnykiv-fitofahiv v ahrotsenozakh oblipykhy krushynopodibnoi ta naukovo-obgruntovani sposoby yikh kontroliu. [Bioecological features of phytophagous pests in agrocenoses of buckthorn and scientifically substantiated methods of their control: monohrafiia]. Kyiv: Vydavnytstvo «Tsentr uchbovoi literatury». 192 s. (in Ukrainian).

The EPPO Global Database: https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/RHAGBA/distribution

Rhagoletis batava Hering, 1958 in GBIF Secretariat (2019). GBIF Backbone Taxonomy. Checklist dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/39omei accessed via GBIF.org on 2021-02-08.

Hering E.M. (1958). Zwei neue palaarktische Rhagoletis (Dipt., Trypet.). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur. Naturkunde, 7. P. 1-4.

Kolomiets N.G. (1970). Novyie i maloizvestnyie vidyi faunyi Sibiri. [A new subspecies Rhagoletis batava Hg. from Siberia. New and little-known species of the fauna of Siberia]. 3. S.40-52. (in Russian).

Drozdovskiy E.M. (2002). Areal oblepihovoy muhi rasshiryaetsya. [The range of the sea buckthorn fly is expanding]. Zaschita i karantin rasteniy. 5. S. 58. (in Russian).

Bogomolova N.I. (2009). Ustoichivost sortov i form oblepihi k oblepihovoy muhe (Rhagoletis batava obscuriosa Kol.) v usloviyah sredney polosyi Rossii. [Resistance of varieties and forms of sea buckthorn to sea buckthorn fly (Rhagoletis batava obscuriosa Kol.) In the conditions of central Russia]. Agrarnyiy vestnik Urala. 10. S. 27-30. (in Russian).

Shamanskaya L.D. (2015). Bioecology of the sea-buckthorn fly (Rhagoletis batava obscuriosa Kol.) and pest control treatment in Altai. In: Kauppinen S, Petruneva E, eds. Producing Sea Buckthorn of High Quality. Helsinki: 2015; Natural Resources Institute Finland. P. 7–20.

Korneyev V.A. (2003). New and little-known Tephritidae (Diptera, Cyclorrhapha) from Europe. Vestnik zoologii, 37 (3), 3–12.

Aartsen B.van (2001). Rhagoletis indifferens, een nieuwe boorvlieg voor de nederlandse fauna (Diptera: Tephritidae). Nederlandse faunistische Mededelingen. 14: 19-22.

Höhne, Fr., Gießmann, H.-J. (2013). Ein neuer Schädling bedroht den Sanddornanbau massives Auftreten in Versuchen der Landesforschungsanstalt 2013! Info-Blatt, 22 (5), 280–285.

Stalažs A. (2014). New records of Tephritoidea (Diptera: Brachycera) for the fauna of Latvia. Zool. Ecol., 24, 347–351.

Rupais A., Stalažs A., Strelčūns R. (2014). Kokaugu kaitēkļu noteicçjs pçc bojājumiem augļdārzos un apstādījumos. Scripta Letonica, 1, 5–221.

Stalažs A., Balalaikins M. (2017). Country checklist of rhagoletis loew (Diptera: Tephritidae) for europe, with focus on R. batava and its recent range expansion. Proceedings of the Latvian academy of sciences. Section B, Vol. 71 (2017), No. 3 (708), Р. 103–110. DOI: 10.1515/prolas-2017-0018

Shalkevich, M. S., Koltun, N. Y., Pleskatsevich, R. I. (2014). Sea buckthorn pests and diseases in Belarus. In: Abstract book of the 3rd European Workshop on Sea buckthorn EuroWorkS 2014, Naantali, Finland October 14-16 2014, MTT, P. 26.

Brūvelis A. (2015). Proceedings of Producing Sea Buckthorn of High Quality. Natural Resources Institute Finland; Naantali, Finland. Experiences about sea buckthorn cultivation and harvesting in Latvia. P. 36–41.

NPPO of the Czech Republic (2017). http://eagri.cz/public/web/en/ukzuz/portal/harmful-organisms/pest-risk-analysis/pra-in-the-czech-republic/

Diadechko M. P., Padii M. M., Shelestova V.S., Dehtiarov B.H. (1990). Osnovy biolohichnoho metodu zakhystu Roslyn. [Fundamentals of biological method of plant protection]. 3-yevyd., dop. y perer. Kyiv: Urozhai. 272 s. (in Ukrainian).

Diadechko M.P., Padii M. M., Shelestova V.S., Dehtiarov B.H. (2001). Biolohichnyi zakhyst roslyn [Biological plant protection]. Bila Tserkva. 312 s. (in Ukrainian).

Būda V., Blažytė-Čereškienė L., Radžiutė S. ir kita (2020). Male-Produced (−)-δ-Heptalactone, Pheromone of Fruit Fly Rhagoletis batava (Diptera: Tephritidae), a Sea Buckthorn Berries Pest. Insects; 11(2): 138. doi: 10.3390/insects11020138].

Papaj D.R., Garcia J.M., Pimentel А.H. (1996). Marking of host fruit by male Rhagoletis boycei cresson flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and its effect on egg-laying. J. Insect Behav. 9: 585–598. doi: 10.1007/BF02213882.

Sarles L., Boullis A., Fassotte B. et al. (2017). Identification of walnut husk (Juglans regia L.) volatiles and the behavioural response of the invasive Walnut Husk Fly, Rhagoletis completa Cresson. Pest Manag. Sci. 73. Р. 2100–2104. doi: 10.1002/ps.4584.

Mozūraitis R., Aleknavičius D., Vepštaitė-Monstavičė І., ir kita (2020). Hippophae rhamnoides berry related Pichia kudriavzevii yeast volatiles modify behaviour of Rhagoletis batava flies. Journal of Advanced Research. Vol. 21. P. 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2019.08.001

Kandyibina M.N. (1977). Lichinki plodovyih muh-pestrokryilok (Diptera, Tephritidae). [Fruit fly larvae (Diptera, Tephritidae)] (V serii: «Opredeliteli po faune SSSR, izdavaemyie Zoologicheskim institutom AN SSSR»). Leningrad: Izd-vo «Nauka». 212 s. (in Russian).

Ogneva L.I. (1979). Metodika izucheniya plodovyih muh pestrokryilok. [Methods for studying fruit flies of variegated flies] Metodicheskie ukazaniya po izucheniyu i razrabotke mer borbyi s vreditelyami, boleznyami i sornyakami v sadah Sibiri. Barnaul: Alt. kn. izd-vo. S. 81-87. (in Russian).

Dovhan S.V. (2009). Modeli prohnozu ta rozmnozhennia fitofahiv: monohrafiia. [Models of prognosis and reproduction of phytophages]. Kherson: Ailant. 208 s. (in Ukrainian).

Lisovyi M.P., Bublyk L.I., Vasechko H.I., Vasyliev V.P. (1999). Dovidnyk iz zakhystu roslyn. [Handbook of plant protection]. Kyiv: Urozhai. 744 s. (in Ukrainian).

Betther I. (1987). Metodyi opredeleniya bolezney i vrediteley selskohozyaystvennyih kultur. [Methods for determining diseases and pests of agricultural crops]. Moskva: Agropromizdat. 223 s. (in Russian).

Schegolev V.N. (1937). Opredelitel nasekomyih po povrezhdeniyam kulturnyih rasteniy. [Keys to insects by damage to cultivated plants]. Moskva-Dagestan: Selhozgiz. 525 s. (in Russian).

Shamanskaya L.D. (2010). Biologicheskiy sposob zaschityi oblepihi ot oblepihovoy muhi (Rhagoletis batava obscuriosa Kol.). [Biological method of protecting sea buckthorn from sea buckthorn fly (Rhagoletis batava obscuriosa Kol.)]. Dostizheniya nauki i tehniki APK [Advances in science and technology AIC]. S. 48-50. (in Russian).

Programma i metodika sortoizucheniya plodovyih, yagodnyih i orehoplodnyih kultur. [Program and methodology for the variety study of fruit, berry and nut crops]. RASHN VNIISPK. Orel, 1999. S. 404-416. (in Russian).

Moskalets V.V., Hrynyk I.V., Moskalets T.Z., Frantsishko V.S. (2019). Metodychni rekomendatsii z vyznachennia ekoloho-adaptyvnoho i produktyvnoho ahrobiopotentsialu henotypiv oblipykhy (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) dlia selektsii ta intensyvnoho sadivnytstva. [Methodical recommendations for determining the ecological-adaptive and productive agrobiopotential of genotypes of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) for selection and intensive horticulture]. Novosilky: FOP «Sladkevych B.A.». 58 s. (in Ukrainian).

Hrynyk I.V., Moskalets V.V., Moskalets T.Z. ta in. (2020). Selektsiino-tekhnolohichni osnovy vyroshchuvannia oblipykhy krushynopodibnoi v umovakh Lisostepu y Polissia Ukrainy: monohrafiia. [Selection and technological bases of buckthorn cultivation in the conditions of the Forest-steppe and Polissya of Ukraine]. Novosilky: Vydavnytstvo «Tsentr uchbovoi literatury». 192 s. (in Ukrainian).

Hovalyig N.A. (2008). Bolezni i vrediteli oblepihi v Tyive. [Diseases and pests of sea buckthorn in Tuva]. Zaschita i karantin rasteniy. N 4. S. 53-54. (in Russian).

Published
2021-05-27
How to Cite
Moskalets, T., Moskalets, V., Grynyk, I., & Shevchuk , I. (2021). Sea buckthorn fly, manifestations of its turn and control in agrocenoses of buckthorn. Quarantine and Plant Protection, (2), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.36495/2312-0614.2021.2.12-18
Section
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH