Climat change and its impact on the expansion of the area Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Europe
Goal. Analysis and generalization of the results of research on the problem of a global nature regarding the expansion of the range of the species Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. as a result of the impact of climate change.
Methods. System-analytical, abstract-logical, empirical.
Research results. According to research, scientists have predicted that A. artemisiifolia will shift to the northeast and expand its potential range in Europe due to climate change. It has been established that the spread of A. artemisiifolia is facilitated by global warming in Europe, which leads to the manifestation of high invasive potential of the species in wide ranges within Europe. Using ENM, scientists have clearly identified areas that are at risk of spreading and undergoing negative changes.
Conclusions. Global warming, which has already taken place, continues to contribute to the further spread and manifestation of the invasive potential of A. artemisiifolia in Europe, according to the simulation results. Multilateral studies by foreign scientists on the impact of climate change on the spread of ragweed have shown that Ukraine is one of the countries in which this vicious species of weed will spread. Such research contributes to the effectiveness of decisions that depend on the protection and preservation of crops, the preservation of the country’s biodiversity, as well as the ability to take into account its impact on public health. Under such conditions, measures for monitoring and management of the species are extremely relevant.
T.C.G. Rich. (1994). Ragweeds (Ambrosia L.) in Britain. GRANA, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 38—43.
G. Vogl, M. Smolik, L. M. Stadler et al. (2008). Modelling the spread of ragweed: effects of habitat, climate change and diffusion. European Physical Journal. vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 167—173.
P. Taramarcaz, C. Lambelet, B. Clot, C. Keimer, and C. Hauser. (2005). Ragweed (Ambrosia) progression and its health risks: will Switzerland resist this invasion? Swiss Medical Weekly, vol. 135, no. 37—38, pp. 538—548.
B. Chauvel, F. Dessaint, C. Cardinal-Legrand, and F. Bretagnolle. (2006). The historical spread of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. in France from herbarium records. Journal of Biogeography, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 665—673.
B. Alberternst, S. Nawrath, and F. Klingenstein. (2006). Biologie, Verbreitung und Einschleppungswege von Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Deutschland und Bewertung aus Naturschutzsicht, Biology, distribution and pathways of introduction of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in Germany and assessment from a nature conservation point of view. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes, vol. 58, pp. 1—7.
S. Pompe, J. Hanspach, F. Badeck, S. Klotz, W. Thuiller, and I. Kühn. (2008). Climate and land use change impacts on plant distributions in Germany. Ecology Letters, vol. 4, pp. 564—567.
O. Bossdorf, H. Auge, L. Lafuma, W.E. Rogers, E. Siemann, and D. Prati. (2005). Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia, vol. 144, no. 1, pp. 1—11.
W. Thuiller, D. M. Richardson, and G. F. Midgley. (2007). Will climate change promote alien invasions? in Biological Invasions, W. Nentwig, Ed., vol. 193, pp. 197—211, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
J.J. Hellmann, J.E. Byers, B.G. Bierwagen, and J.S. Dukes. (2008). Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Conservation Biology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 534—543.
V. Hermoso, M. Clavero, F. Blanco-Garrido, and J. Prenda. (2011). Invasive species and habitat degradation in Iberian streams: an analysis of their role in freshwater fish diversity loss. Ecological Applications, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 175—188.
P.J. Prentis, J.R.U. Wilson, E.E. Dormontt, D.M. Richardson, and A.J. Lowe. (2008). Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends in Plant Science, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 288—294.
G. Schrader. (2004). Risikoanalyse von gebietsfremden Pflanzen? Das neue Konzept der EPPO. Gesunde Pflanzen, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 75—79.
P. Steinbauer and B. Grigsby. (1957). Interaction of temperature, light, and moistening agent in the germination of weed seeds. Weeds, vol. 5, pp. 175—182.
M.C. Leiblein and R. Lösch. (2011). Biomass development and CO2 gas exchange of Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. under different soil moisture conditions. Flora, vol. 206, no. 5, pp. 511—516.
E. Martínez-Meyer. (2005). Climate change and biodiversity: some considerations in forecasting shifts in species’ potential distribution. Biodiversity Informatics, vol. 2, pp. 42—55.
A. Guisan and W. Thuiller. (2005). Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 993—1009.
W. Thuiller, D.M. Richardson, P. Pyssek, G.F. Midgley, G.O. Hughes, and M. Rouget. (2005). Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale. Global Change Biology, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2234—2250.
A. Jiménez-Valverde, J. M. Lobo, and J. Hortal. (2008). Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Diversity and Distributions, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 885—890.
M.P. Austin. (2002). Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling, vol. 157, no. 2—3, pp. 101—118.
C.F. Randin et al. (2006). Are niche-based species distribution models transferable in space? Journal of Biogeography, vol. 33, pp. 1689—1703.
P. Flemons, R. Guralnick, J. Krieger, A. Ranipeta, and D. Neufeld. (2007). A web-based GIS tool for exploring the world’s biodiversity: the Global Biodiversity Information Facility Mapping and Analysis Portal Application (GBIF-MAPA). Ecological Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49—60.
R.J. Hijmans, S.E. Cameron, J.L. Parra, P.G. Jones, and A. Jarvis. (2005). Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, vol. 25, no. 15, pp. 1965—1978.
R.G. Pearson and T.P. Dawson. (2003). Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 361—371.
IPCC, Climate Change 2007: the Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment, Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
G.M. Flato, G.J. Boer, W.G. Lee et al. (2000). The Canadian centre for climate modelling and analysis global coupled model and its climate. Climate Dynamics, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 451—467.
A.C. Hirst, H.B. Gordon, and S.P. O’Farrell. (1996). Global warming in a coupled climate model including oceanic eddy-induced advection. Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 23, no. 23, pp. 3361—3364.
C. Gordon, C. Cooper, C.A. Senior et al. (2000). The simulation of SST, sea ice extents and ocean heat transports in a version of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Climate Dynamics, vol. 16, no. 2—3, pp. 147—168.
V.D. Pope, M.L. Gallani, P.R. Rowntree, and R.A. Stratton. (2000). The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3. Climate Dynamics, vol. 16, no. 2—3, pp. 123—146.
J. Elith, C.H. Graham, R.P. Anderson et al. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography, vol. 29, pp. 129—151.
A.T. Peterson, M. Papes, and D.A. Kluza. (2003). Predicting the potential invasive distributions of four alien plant species in North America. Weed Science, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 863—868.
A.H. Fielding and J.F. Bell. (1997). A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 38—49.
J. Elith and J.R. Leathwick. (2009). Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 677—697.
B. Schröder and O. Richter. (1999). Are habitat models transferable in space and time? Zeitschrift für Ökologie und Naturschutz, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 195—205.
M. Marmion, M. Parviainen, M. Luoto, R.K. Heikkinen, and W. Thuiller. (2009). Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Diversity and Distributions, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 59—69.
D.W. Hosmer and S. Lemeshow. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
J.S. Clark. (2001). Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. Science, vol. 293, no. 5530, pp. 657—660.
C. Perrings, K. Dehnen-Schmutz, J. Touza, and M. Williamson. (2005). How to manage biological invasions under globalization. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 212—215.
L. Makra, M. Juhász, R. Béczi, and E. Borsos. (2005). The history and impacts of airborne Ambrosia (Asteraceae) pollen in Hungary. GRANA, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 57—64.
O. Broennimann, U.A. Treier, H. Müller-Schärer, W. Thuiller, A.T. Peterson, and A. Guisan. (2007). Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecology Letters, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 701—709.
S. Dullinger, I. Kleinbauer, J. Peterseil, M. Smolik, and F. Essl. (2009). Niche based distribution modelling of an invasive alien plant: effects of population status, propagule pressure and invasion history. Biological Invasions, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 2401—2414.
F. Essl, S. Dullinger, and I. Kleinbauer. (2009). Changes in the spatio-temporal patterns and habitat preferences of Ambrosia artemisiifolia during its invasion of Austria. Preslia, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 119—133.
G. Kazinczi, I. Béres, R. Novák, K. Bíró, and Z. Pathy. (2008). Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.): a review with special regards to the results in Hungary. Taxonomy, origin and distribution, morphology, life cycle and reproduction strategy. Herbologia, vol. 9, pp. 55—91.
Á. Tóth, P.Z. Hoffmanné, and L. Szentey. (2004). Ambrosia situation in Hungary in 2003. Difficulties of pollen reduction in the air. Іn Proceedings of the 10th Plant Protection Days, Budapest, Hungary.
D. Pimentel, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 273—288.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.