Broompare in sunflower crops and control methods

  • O. Ivashchenko Institute of Plant Protection of NAAS, 33, Vasylkivska str., Kyiv, Ukraine, 03022
Keywords: weeds, sunflower top, crop protection

Abstract

Goal. The study of the biological characteristics and developing methods for effective control of Broomrape in sunflower crops.

Methods. The comprehensive study included the route survey of crops in the five regions of the country where traditionally the acreage of sunflower is the largest part in the structure of arable land. Was conducted sampling of the soil in the fields to assess the level of contamination by seeds of Broomrape. Repeated the test 4. Surveys and monitoring of the crops was carried out in accordance with the requirements methods of testing and use of pesticides.

Results. Studies show that the presence of 2—7 of Broomrape stalks per 1 m2 of sunflower crops leading to reduced yields of seed cultures by 10—15%. In the presence of 35—40 pieces/m2 of stalks of the parasite reduction reaches 70—85% of the possible yields of crops. Sample survey of crops of sunflower and soil samples from the arable layer (0—30 cm) during the study years (Zaporizhzhia, Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa, etc.) and their analysis for the presence of seeds of Broomrape showed a high level of contamination. In the upper part of the topsoil (0—10 cm) found 124—1160 seeds/m2 seed of the parasite. However, only a 0.012—0.22% of the total quantity present in the soil of seeds of the parasite germinate in the spring as a result of interaction with the roots of the plant opinion. Easier to just hit the Broomrape seedling primary roots of sunflower plants in the juvenile and amatory stages of organogenesis (May — June).

Conclusions. The practice of using resistant against the respective races of Broomrape sunflower hybrids ensures to provide only a temporary and partial positive results. Immune to defeat different races of Broomrape sunflower hybrids there, and to existing sustainable hybrids parasite quickly forms a new more aggressive population. The most effective nowadays are preventive measures which make it possible to obtain high yields of sunflower and not to complicate the phytosanitary situation on arable lands in the future.

References

Artokhin K.S. (2010). Sornye rasteniya [Weed plants]. Moskva: Pechatnyy Gorod. 272 p. [in Russian].

Hudz V.P., Rybak M.F., Tymoshenko M.M., Malynovskyi A.S. (2010). Ekolohichni problemy zemlerobstva [Environmental problems of agriculture]. Zhytomyr: Zhytomyrskyi natsionalnyi ahroekolohichnyi universytet. 708 p. [in Ukrainian].

Fisyunov A.V. (1984). Sornye rasteniya [Weed plants]. Moskva: Kolos. 319 p. [in Russian].

Durr C., Dicie J.B., Yang X.Y., Prit­chard H.W. (2015). Ranges of critical temperature and water potential values for the germination of spicers worldwide: contribution to a seed trait database. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 200. Р. 222—232.

Gaba S. (2016). Determonation of fatty acids content, global antiocsidant activity and energy value of weed seeds from farmland in France. Weed Research. 56. P. 78—95.

Bellanger S., Gullemin J.P., Touzeau S. Darmengy H. (2015). Variation of inbreeding depression in Centaurea cyanis L., a self — incompatible species. Flora. 212. P. 24—29.

Gardarin A., Colbach N. (2015). How much of seed dormancy in weeds can be related to seed traits? Weed Research. 5. P. 14—25.

Perronne R., Le Corre V., Bretagnolle V., Gaba S. (2015). Stochastic processes and agronomic factor shape weed community assembly within and between crop types. Journal of Vegetation Science. 26. P. 348—359.

Fan J.Y., Zhao N.X., Li M. et al. (2018). What are the best predictos for invasive potential of weeds? Transferability evaluations of molel predictions based on diverse environmental data sets for Flaveria bidentis Weed Research. 58. P. 141—149.

Campiglia E., Radicetti E., Mancinelli R. (2015). Cover crops and mulches influence weed management and weed flora composition in strip- tilled tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Weed Research. 55. P. 416—425.

Zhu G.P., Peterson A.T. (2017). Do concensus models outperform individual models? Transferability evaluations of diverse modeling approaches for an invasive moth. Biological Invasions. 19. P 2519—2532.

Chiappetta S., Ghiani A., Gilardelli F., Bonini M., Citteria S., Gаrntili R. (2016). Invasion of Ambrisia artemisiifilia in Italy: assessment via analysis of genetic variability and herbarium data. Flora. 223. P. 106—113.

Sardana V., Manajan G., Jabran K., Chauhan B.S. (2017). Role of competition in managing weeds : an introduction to the special issue. Crop Protection. 95. P. 1—7.

Cutler G.C., Astatkie T., Chahil G.S. (2016). Weed seed granivory by carabid beetles and crickets for biological control of weeds in commercial lowbuch blueberry fields. Agricultural & Forest Entomology. 18. P. 390—397.

Tang K., Struik P.C., Yin X. et al. (2016). Comparing hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars for dual — purpose production under contrasting environments. Industrial Crops and Products. 87. P. 33—44.

Trybel S.O. (Ed.). (2001). Metodyka provedennia vyprobuvannia i zastosuvannia pestytsydiv [Methods of testing and application of pesticides]. Kyiv: Svit. 448 p. [in Ukrainian].

Published
2020-03-19
How to Cite
Ivashchenko , O. (2020). Broompare in sunflower crops and control methods. Quarantine and Plant Protection, (2-3), 13-16. https://doi.org/10.36495/2312-0614.2020.2-3.13-16
Section
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH